Enthymeme Construction in Dialogues using Shared Knowledge
نویسندگان
چکیده
Enthymemes, arguments with incomplete structure, are a ubiquitous feature of human communication and argumentation. This paper proposes a way of representing enthymemes and arguments within the ASPIC+ framework, and how enthymemes are constructed based on estimates of shared knowledge. It then proposes a framework in which agents are capable of constructing a model of other agent’s knowledge.
منابع مشابه
The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory
In traditional logic, an enthymeme is said to be an argument, or chain of argumentation, with one or more missing (implicit) premises or conclusions. In this paper a new theory of enthymemes, based on recent developments in argumentation technology including argumentation schemes, argument visualization tools and formal dialogue systems, is put forward. The dialogical theory hypothesizes three ...
متن کاملA Relevance-theoretic Framework for Constructing and Deconstructing Enthymemes
In most proposals for logic-based models of argumentation dialogues between agents, the arguments exchanged are logical arguments of the form 〈Φ, α〉 where Φ is a set of formulae (called the support) and α is a formula (called the claim) such that Φ is consistent and Φ entails α. However, arguments presented by real-world agents do not normally fit the mould of being logical arguments. They are ...
متن کاملThe Effect of Role-Play through Dialogues vs. Written Practice on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Knowledge of English Idioms
This study aimed to investigate the effect of role-play through dialogues vs. written practice on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ knowledge of English idioms. The question this study tried to answer is if role-play through dialogues vs. written practice has a significant effect on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ knowledge of English idioms. To find the answer to the question, ...
متن کاملDialogues and Perception of Intersubjectivity in a Small Group
The core value of Web 2.0 lies in its potential for building technologies that are open, decentralized, and shared. This paper designs group activity to facilitate knowledge building and move on learning management system to web 2.0 paradigms with computer supported collaborative learning in a small group. The “give-take” metaphor for knowledge construction in a small group discourse only inter...
متن کاملUsing Enthymemes to Fill the Gap between Logical Argumentation and Revision of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
In this paper, we present a preliminary work on an approach to fill the gap between logic-based argumentation and the numerous approaches to tackle the dynamics of abstract argumentation frameworks. Our idea is that, even when arguments and attacks are defined by means of a logical belief base, there may be some uncertainty about how accurate is the content of an argument, and so the presence (...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014